Tuesday, 28 February 2012

5 Interesting Facts About Water Pollution

Water or H2O is one of the main sources of life, a compound making up an average 65% of our body and 71% of the earth’s surface. When speaking of water most people think about oceans, which constitute 97% of the bodies of water on the globe. Yet water on our planet can also be found in lakes, rivers, glaciers, ice, ponds and of course underground aquifers.

Unfortunately, when it comes to our environment, all of these bodies of water are in danger of becoming polluted if they are not already.

Alongside many myths concerning water pollution there are a few facts we should all know concerning contaminated water and the possible future shortage of clean water we are globally faced with. Here are the top five facts about water pollution:

1. We can’t drink saltwater

This fact might seem a bit silly to start off with, but one that is very important to understand. Most of the water we have on this planet comes from the ocean, which means saltwater. If we can’t drink saltwater that leaves us with much lower numbers to begin with. Remember that 97% figure at the top? Cross that out. That water is unfortunately irrelevant for human consumption.

2. Only 20% of contaminated water is caused by water based pollutants

Also known as point source pollution, this kind of contamination is caused when waste is discharged directly into the water. The most recent event of this kind would be the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Yet, as noted on top, only 20% of water pollution is caused by water based activities. In other words, even if you’re not a beach person, you still have a hand in turning our water grey.

3. 80% of contaminated water were cased by land based pollutants

Non point source pollution is when harmful chemicals and substances are carried to the water by environmental changes. Litter, human sewage, fertilizers and raw waste sooner or later all cause, unless treated, sediments that end up on the bottom of ponds, lakes and rivers.

To read more about this go to:

http://scipeeps.com/water-pollution-facts-in-numbers-and-stats/

4. Water pollution is a huge health hazard

Not all people are eco-inclined and that’s understandable, yet we are all health oriented. So if you don’t care about the coral reef, you’ll probably care about catching diarrhea caused by water pollution which is responsible for 1.5 million annual deaths worldwide.

Add to that figure another 13.5 million deaths a year caused by different water pollution triggered ailments in developing countries but not only, and you’ll come to realize that water pollution is a people problem rather than a fish problem.

To read more about this go to:

http://pollutionarticles.blogspot.com/2010/05/facts-about-water-pollution.html

5. We are facing a constant decline in freshwater resources

With our freshwater bases consisting only 3% of global water resources, every drop counts. Yet when 75% of the bays in the U.S. alone are degrading annually and over half of China’s seven major rivers are contaminated in numbers well over the safety regulations, the future is looking pretty grim.

To read more about this go to: http://water.ygoy.com/water-pollution-facts/

Acting now, isn’t a choice but a must. Starting from your own home by separating waste products, through the way you act on the beach, to the kind of diesel you use for your car. That’s exactly where the value of creating the blog and sharing the information about the blog is, finding out the truth and utilizing the knowledge we've learned to help resolve the problem or bring up more attention on the topics!

Reference:

Global Energy

http://global-nrg.biz/blog/?p=50

Finding out about water pollution 1.5

Water pollution facts
Intro: information about water pollution can be approached by a vivid aspect, below presents a collection of brief facts on water pollution in details and many of the causes are mainly surrounded by our real lives.

Water Pollution Fact #1: Water from rain, storm drains, and ditches flows directly to streams and bays with little or no treatment. Storm drains and ditches are DIFFERENT than sewers. They are NOT CONNECTED to a treatment plant.

Water Pollution Fact #2:
We all live in a watershed. What you do on your property does affect streams, even if you don’t live on a stream. A watershed is an area of land which drains to the lowest point, usually a stream or bay.

Water Pollution Fact #3:
Small amounts of contaminants from all over the land add up to cause pollution in our water. Yes, even the little things matter. You WILL make a difference, no matter how small, if you change the way you do some things.

  • Follow the suggestions in this Fact Sheet to minimize your impact on our water.

Water Pollution Fact #4: Failing septic systems pollute. Untreated wastewater from failing septic systems can contaminate nearby streams, drinking water sources, and bays.

  • Inspect your septic system every 3-5 years.
  • Pump as needed.

Water Pollution Fact #5: Soap from washing your car at home pollutes. Soap and dirt from washing your car can flow through our storm drains and ditches and end up in our streams untreated.

  • Wash your car at a commercial car wash, on the grass, or on a graveled area.

Water Pollution Fact #6: Soap from charity car washes can pollute if not handled properly.

  • Many charity car washes use available alternatives to prevent dirty, soapy water from going down the storm drain. Commercial car wash water goes to the sewer and is treated. Hold your charity car wash at a commercial car wash with a charity car wash program.
  • Contact Kitsap County’s Sound Car Wash Program at 360-337-5777 to reserve the FREE Bubble Buster.

Water Pollution Fact #7: Oil and antifreeze from leaking cars pollutes. When it rains, water runs over the ground and picks up oil, antifreeze, and other pollutants and carries them to our streams and bays.

  • Put a drip tray under your car to catch car leaks.
  • Fix car leaks.

Water Pollution Fact #8: Garden and lawn chemicals pollute. Common pesticides and fertilizers have been found in neighborhood streams in the Puget Sound Region.

  • Pull weeds by hand.
  • Avoid use of chemicals. If necessary, use sparingly and as directed.
  • Call for information on alternatives to weed and bug killers.

Water Pollution Fact #9: Household cleaners and chemicals can pollute. Cleaners and chemicals used or disposed of outside can end up in our streams and bays. These same cleaners and chemicals can cause harm to septic systems and wastewater treatment plants.

  • Contact The Open Line for alternatives to household cleaners and chemicals.

Water Pollution Fact #10: Pet waste pollutes our water. Pet waste contributed to the pollution that closed some shellfish beds in Kitsap County.

  • Scoop, double bag, and throw pet waste in the garbage.

Water Pollution Fact #11: Waste from livestock pollutes our water. When it rains, water runs over fields and pastures and can carry harmful bacteria from livestock waste to streams and provides unwanted fertilizer in streams.

  • Compost livestock waste.
  • Fence livestock from stream access.
  • Contact Kitsap Conservation District at 360-337-7171 for assistance and alternatives.

Water Pollution Fact #12: Driveways and walkways can be sources of water pollution. Oil, antifreeze, and other pollutants can collect on your driveway. If you hose down the driveway, the water carries all these pollutants to the streams.

  • Sweep your driveway and walkways instead of hosing down.
  • Use apple vinegar to kill moss on driveways and walkways.

Water Pollution Fact # 13: Lawn clippings and yard waste in ravines and ponds can become unwanted fertilizer for streams. Too much plant growth in streams can use up all the oxygen and kill fish and aquatic life.

  • Compost your yard waste.
  • Use a mulching mower.

Water Pollution Fact # 14: Too much soil in runoff can pollute. Soil from erosion carries pollutants and smothers salmon eggs in spawning gravel.

  • Plant vegetation on or cover bare ground.
  • Cover piles of soil.
  • Fence livestock from stream access.

Water Pollution Fact # 15: Sewage from boating can pollute. Untreated sewage is a significant risk to human health and wildlife.

  • While boating, treat and dispose of your sewage properly.
  • Pump your waste holding tanks at pump-out facilities.
  • Properly maintain marine sanitation device hoses to prevent clogging and unnecessary odors.

Water Pollution Fact # 16: Boat and engine maintenance can pollute. Toxic chemicals, oils, cleaners, and paint scrapings from boat maintenance can make their way into the water.

  • Complete any maintenance involving paints, solvents, or sanding with the boat pulled out of and away from the water.
  • Pick-up, don't rinse-off. Use drop cloths, drip pans and vacuums to collect and contain paint, fluids and scrapings associated with maintenance projects.
  • Use less toxic or non-toxic cleaning alternatives.
  • Use oil absorbent pillows or pads in your bilge to soak up oil.
  • Use anti-fouling paints with caution and according to the manufacturer's directions.
  • Contact the Washington Sea Grant Program at 360-337-7165 for information and classes on clean boating and boating maintenance.

Water Pollution Fact # 17: Oil and antifreeze pollute our water when disposed of improperly. Oil and antifreeze that are spilled during maintenance or are dumped on the ground can be carried by runoff to our streams and bays.

  • Clean up small spills with rags. For larger spills, use absorbent kitty litter and sweep it up with a broom.
  • Use drip pans when unclipping hoses, unscrewing filters, or removing other parts.
  • Recycle used oil and antifreeze. Call The Open Line for recycling information and locations, or visit www.wa.gov/kitsapgov.com.

Water Pollution Fact # 18: Waste from household repairs can pollute our water. Contractors and service people must properly dispose of chemicals and water used during their work.

  • Make sure contractors you hire dispose of chemicals properly.
  • Request use of non-toxic products.

Water Pollution Fact # 19: Littering pollutes. Litter thrown on the ground can end up in our storm drains, ditches, and streams.

  • Throw all litter in appropriate trash cans.
  • Keep litter out of pick up truck beds and cover loads so items aren't blown off to the ground.
  • Recycle and reuse items whenever possible.

Water Pollution Fact # 20: The things we do everyday contribute to over half the pollution in Puget Sound. Litter thrown on the ground can end up in our storm drains, ditches, and streams.

  • Wash your car at a commercial car wash, on the grass, or a graveled area.
  • Pull weeds manually or use chemicals sparingly and as directed.
  • Scoop, double bag, and throw pet waste in the garbage.
  • Inspect your septic system regularly and pump it as needed.
  • Contact the Open Line for more facts and alternatives.

Sunday, 26 February 2012

One solution for clean water.

Hello,

I was replying to Madeline's question and I thought I could share this with everyone.

Here is the link of the video, and I highly recommend you to watch this.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXepkIWPhFQ

This is from a TED Talk, where a number of brilliant people present their ideas.
Michael Pritchard, he made a bottle that can purify 6,000L with one filter.
When the filter cannot be used any more, then the system is automatically shut down.

I found it quite fascinating, and he mentioned that it costs 1/2 cent a day to run. (when a family of 4 uses it for 3 years)

The only problem is the money; in order for this idea to spread throughout the whole world, more supports are needed.



How else, do you guys think we can solve the global problem with clean water?

Wednesday, 15 February 2012

Walkerton E. Coli Tragedy


Walkerton is a relatively small community. At the time of the event Stan Koebel was manager and Frank Koebel was water foreman. Neither had any formal training in their position, retaining their jobs through three decades of on-the-job experience. The water supply became contaminated with the highly dangerous strain of E. coli bacteria, from farm runoff into an adjacent well that was known for years to be vulnerable to contamination.
Starting May 15, 2000, many residents of the town of about 5,000 began to simultaneously experience blue diarrhea, gastrointestinal infections and other symptoms of E. coli infection. For days the Walkerton Public Utilities Commission insisted the water supply was "OK" despite being in possession of laboratory tests that had found evidence of contamination. On May 21, an escalation in the number of patients with similar symptoms finally spurred the region's Medical Officer of Health, Dr. Murray McQuigge, to issue a boil water advisory, warning residents not to drink the water.
At least seven people died directly from drinking the E. coli contaminated water, who might have been saved if the Walkerton Public Utilities Commission had admitted to contaminated water sooner, and about 2,500 became ill.
The CBC news noted:
Premier Harris immediately blamed the former NDP government for loosening water standards. Within a week he had announced public inquiry that wound up laying part of the blame for the Walkerton disaster on cutbacks ordered by the Harris government.
During the time of the tragedy, both Stan and Frank Koebel denied any wrongdoing and firmly held that the water at Walkerton was safe to drink. However, as the tragedy grew in severity the two were eventually part of the criminal investigation into the tragedy, and, as a result, both would eventually plead guilty to a charge of common nuisance through a plea bargain. In their plea, they admitted to falsifying reports and Frank admitted to drinking on the job, though a beer fridge did exist at the facility.
They were both formally sentenced on December 21, 2004, with Stan receiving one year in jail and Frank Koebel nine months of house arrest. Reaction to their sentencing was mixed. 
Via: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walkerton_Tragedy
Comments: 
After reading this article the first thing that came to my mind was how lucky I am that my family and I didn't get infected from the E. coli that was found only a couple hours north of where I live. I was also pretty shocked and upset to hear that 7 people had to die because of the negligence and mistake of the Stan and Frank. But after this tragedy, people started to realize the potential risk of livestock waste, seeping through the ground and getting collected in runoff water, that we drink! This article also relates to the theme of "butterfly effect", what just started as some cow manure, was then collected in some run off water that led to the community water well that is used to drink from, throughout this whole water cycle, the E. coli has been traveling through it undetected until the Walkerton tragedy where got 2500+ sick.

2011 E.Coli Crisis

While this news is not as new, 9 months ago was a fairly serious E.coli crisis in Germany that affected other parts of the world as well.  This crisis, which travelled through the water and food killed 45 people in Germany and affected 3500 others.  In addition to this other countries such as Sweeden, Canada, USA, England and Poland had cases at similar times as well.  This was one of the most recent E.coli crisis' and the first majorly known one in Southern Ontario since the Walkerton E.coli crisis back in the early 21st century.

Water Pollution - Canada

Article: http://environment.about.com/od/waterpollution/a/canadasewage.htm

The article posted above explains how Canada is dumping about 200 billion liters of raw sewage into natural waterways every single year. The sewage being dumped is apparently a mixture of water, human waste, microorganisms, toxic chemicals, heavy metals, and viruses such as hepatitis B, cholera and typhoid. Canada needs to get better infrastructure to have better waste water treatment. Coastal cities have been dumping sewage into open water, where it is out of sight and out of mind for many people, but this needs to stop. People  rely on their environment, well if we are the ones who destroy it we wont have an environment to rely on! Canadians need to take action and take better care of our world and water bodies.

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

Hexavalent Chromium


Hexavalent chromium: Chemical found in drinking water of 31 US cities

Hexavalent chromium is the pollutant at the heart of 'Erin Brockovich.' The movie recounts the legal battle waged by residents of Hinkley, Calif., who blamed exposure to the chemical for high rates of diseases.

By Chris RichardContributor / December 20, 2010
A Pacific Gas & Electric pipeline operations station is seen in Hinkley, Calif., on Dec. 9. The chemical hexavalent chromium, also known as chromium 6, has been found in the drinking water of 31 US cities. Chromium 6 was at the heart of the lawsuit, led by Erin Brockovich, brought by Hinkley residents against PG&E.
Reed Saxon/AP
Enlarge
LOS ANGELES
A national survey has found that the drinking water in 31 US cities contains hexavalent chromium, an industrial chemical that was a key concern in the 2000 film "Erin Brockovich."
The findings were released Monday by theEnvironmental Working Group, which used laboratory tests. It found the highest concentrations of hexavalent chromium, also known as chromium 6, in the drinking water in Norman, Okla.Honolulu; and Riverside, Calif.Levels ranged from 12.9 parts per billion in Norman to 0.03 ppb in Cincinnati and Boston.
For the 35 cities surveyed the average was .18 ppb. That's three times the “public health goal,” or ideal standard, under consideration by California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. [Editor's note: The original version of this paragraph overstated the average concentration and the degree to which it overshot the public health goal.]
Scientific and legal debate has raged over the risk posed by hexavalent chromium in drinking water since the 1990s, when the then-obscure legal file clerk Erin Brockovich unearthed evidence that the substance had leaked from a Pacific Gas & Electric natural-gas plant into the groundwater in Hinkley, Calif.
Residents sued, and in 1996 PG&E paid a $333 million settlement to about 600 people who blamed exposure to the chromium 6 for high rates of cancer and other diseases.
The Environmental Working Group picked its subject cities from those listing high levels of total chromium in their water. While the Environmental Protection Agency does not require testing for hexavalent chromium, it does require testing and has set a limit of 100 parts per billion for all variants of the metal, including the healthful chromium 3.
Rebecca Sutton, who oversaw the Environmental Working Group survey, acknowledges that there have been periodic alarms and lawsuits across the country over chromium 6 contamination.
“What this report indicates is that this problem may be more widespread, just at lower levels of concentration,” she says. “These are chronic exposures we're concerned with. A little bit every day can involve increased risk.”
Many researchers say hexavalent chromium is an inhalation carcinogen, but some have claimed that the risks are negligible when the substance is ingested. Still, in 2009, National Toxicology Program scientists reported that their research “clearly demonstrates” that the compound is a carcinogen in drinking water.
Sam Delson, a spokesman for California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, says his agency considers that finding conclusive. The agency is preparing a public health goal of .06 ppb that would be one factor in determining safe exposure levels.
In Norman, Okla, utilities director Ken Komiske says his agency has always monitored its water supplies closely to make sure it meets the federal standard for all chromium. Mr. Komiske says Norman does not test for chromium 6.
“This report is kind of new to us,” he says, adding that his offices fielded about two dozen calls from concerned Norman residents on Monday. “We've been in touch with the state and federal authorities, asking 'What are we supposed to do next?' ”
Ms. Sutton, of the Environmental Working Group, says her organization hopes the survey will prompt more widespread checks for hexavalent chromium contamination, and new federal regulation.
Via: http://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2010/1220/Hexavalent-chromium-Chemical-found-in-drinking-water-of-31-US-cities

Comments: This article talks about how one company was able to affects hundreds of people's lives, by polluting them and the environment with hexavalent chromium. It was mention above how a women named Rebecca Sutton recognized this problem when it happened in 1996 in Hinkley, California, taking a stand against PG&E made people aware of how action must be taken against companies using Cr 6. Ms. Sutton helped other states change their restrictions and regulations against this, but the use of the Cr hasn't completely stopped yet, we still use in today in Canada for a number of things. With the added regulations and laws the safety of the public was taken into account when allowing industrial us of hexavalent chromium.

Monday, 6 February 2012

Water Pollution - Eutrophication


Eutrophication is a syndrome of ecosystem responses to human activities that fertilize water bodies with nitrogen (N) andphosphorus (P), often leading to changes in animal and plant populations and degradation of water and habitat quality. Nitrogen and phosphorus are essential components of structural proteins, enzymes, cell membranes, nucleic acids, and molecules that capture and utilize light and chemical energy to support life. The biologically available forms of N and P are present at low concentrations in pristine lakes, riversestuaries, and in vast regions of the upper ocean.
Pristine aquatic ecosystems function in approximate steady state in which primary production of new plant biomass is sustained by N and P released as byproducts of microbial and animal metabolism. This balanced state is disrupted by human activities that artificially enrich water bodies with N and P, resulting in unnaturally high rates of plant production and accumulation of organic matter that can degrade water and habitat quality. These inputs may come from untreated sewage discharges, sewage treatmentplants or runoff of fertilizer from farm fields or suburban lawns. In some cases the climax stage of algal blooms can release toxic chemicals such as domoic acid to the aquatic environment, creating elevated metabolic risks to a variety of fish and marine mammals.

Eutrophication syndromes

Algal bloom in Orielton Lagoon, Australia, 1994. (Photo by Geoff Prestedge)Algal bloom in Orielton Lagoon, Australia, 1994. (Photo by Geoff Prestedge)
 
Eutrophication was first evident in lakes and rivers as they became choked with excessive growth of rooted plants and floating algal scums, prompting intense study in the 1960's-70's and culminating in the scientific basis for banning phosphate detergents (a major source of P, the most frequent culprit in eutrophication of lakes) and upgrading sewage treatment to reduce wastewater N and P discharges to inland waters. Symptoms of eutrophication in estuaries and other coastal marine ecosystems (where N is the most frequent contributor to eutrophication) were clearly evident by the 1980's, as human activities doubled the transport of N and tripled the transport of P from Earth's land surface to its oceans. Eutrophication has emerged as a key human stressor on the world'scoastal ecosystems.
Nutrient enrichment of marine waters promotes the growth of algae, either as attached multicellular forms (e.g. sea lettuce) or as suspended microscopic phytoplankton, because algae can grow faster than larger vascular plants. Small increases in algal abundance or biomass have subtle ecological responses that can increase production in food webs sustaining fish and shellfish, even producing higher fish yields. However, over-stimulation of algal growth leads to a complex suite of interconnected biological and chemical responses that can severely degrade water quality and threaten human health and sustainability of living resources in the coastal zone. 
Fish Kill in the <a href='/article/Salton_Sea' title='Salton Sea' class='mw-redirect'>Salton Sea</a> as a result of eutrophication.Fish Kill in the Salton Sea as a result of eutrophication.
As algal biomass builds during blooms it forms aggregates that sink and fuel bacterial growth in bottom waters and sediments. Bacterial metabolism consumes oxygen. If the rates of aeration of water by mixing are slower than bacterial metabolism, then bottom waters become hypoxic (low in oxygen) or anoxic (devoid of oxygen), creating conditions stressful or even lethal for marine invertebrates and fish. Seasonal occurrences of dead zones devoid of oxygen and animal life have expanded in the Gulf of Mexico(where the dead zone has approached the size of New Jersey), the Baltic Sea, and Sea of Marmara as a consequence of eutrophication from nutrients delivered by large rivers.
Seagrasses are important communities in undisturbed shallow coastal ecosystems, providing essential habitat for many species of marine animals. The distribution and abundance of seagrasses have greatly diminished in nutrient-enriched coastal waters, such as Chesapeake Bay and Danish estuaries, where water transparency and light availability to rooted plants have declined as result of phytoplankton growth and fouling of the grass blades by epiphytes and biofilms. These habitat changes propagate through food webs, and the abundance and species diversity of fish and shellfish decrease as seagrasses are eliminated from nutrient-enriched coastal waters.
Some phytoplankton species excrete large quantities of mucilage during blooms that is whipped into foam by wind mixing and washes ashore, making beaches undesirable for holiday visitors. Other phytoplankton species produce toxic chemicals that can impair respiratory, nervous, digestive and reproductive system function, and even cause death of fish, shellfish, seabirds, mammals, and humans. The economic impacts of harmful algal blooms can be severe as tourism is lost and shellfish harvest and fishing are closed across increasingly widespread marine regions. Marine scientists are trying to determine if and how nutrient enrichment selectively promotes the growth of harmful algal species, and if the frequency of harmful algal blooms has increased globally in response to nutrient enrichment.

Terrestrial plant succession

The progression of eutrophication events for ponds and lakes can eventually create detritus layers that produces successively shallower depths of surface waters. Eventually the water body can be reduced to a marsh or bog, whose plant community is transformed from an aquatic environment to a recognisable terrestrial ecosystem. While this system may first emerge as a plant succession of marsh grasses and related aquatic forbs, the community may evolve to be more of a bog or fen, and finally a vernal pool or meadow. This progression can clearly spawn radical changes in the entire ecosystem, which began as an aquatic habitat, and has been transformed into a fully terrestrial community, albeit inhabited by a number of mesic plants and water oriented animals such as amphibians.

Ecological consequences

There are numerous outcomes to the ecosystems associated with eutrophication environments. Most of these are viewed as unfavorable to the biota which have historically comprised a given habitat. The general types of ecological consequences include: reduction in biodiversity, die-off of certain organisms, reduction in visibility and mobility functions due to biotic overgrowth (which effects can interfere with plant metabolism and with aquatic animal transport); reduction in dissolved oxygen and associated fitness reduction in animals dependent upon oxygen levels. In the case of utter transformation of lakes to bogs and meadows, the ecological consequences are extreme, and result in replacement of an original ecosystem with an entirely different one; such progression occurs in the natural world, although human induced additions of N and P greatly accelerate the progression as compared to a natural landscape evolution. In such accelerated circumstances, organisms may not have the time needed to migrate or adapt to the rapidly altered new environment.

Mitigation

Protection of marine waters from the harmful consequences of nutrient enrichment is a challenge to resource managers because the sources and delivery routes of N and P are diverse. Combustion of fossil fuels produces gaseous nitrogen oxides, and animal production and fertilizer use produce volatile ammonia, two sources of atmospheric N that can be carried by winds and deposited on coastal waters and lakes hundreds of kilometers from their origin. Modern high-yield agriculture, golf courses, parks and urban gardeners presently use commercial fertilizers in large quantities -- substances that became cheap to produce in the mid 20th century – the era in which N and P concentrations began to increase in surface waters carrying agricultural and urban runoff to the sea. The world's human population is growing disproportionately in the coastal zone, creating an additional challenge of reducing nutrient inputs from municipal waste, septic systems, and fertilizer runoff from lawns and gardens. Projections indicate that the largest future increases in N and P delivery to the coastal ocean will occur in eastern and southern Asia where populations and economies are growing most rapidly.
The eutrophication problem illustrates how human activities on land can degrade the quality of coastal waters and habitats, with potentially large economic and ecological costs. Solutions to the coastal eutrophication problem require changes in all these activities within the watersheds and airsheds connected to coastal waters. Commitments to these solutions are now beginning – the European Union's Water Framework Directive mandates strategies to reduce N and P delivery to coastal waters, and a 2000 National Research Council report recommended a National Coastal Nutrient Management Strategy for the United States.
Proposed solutions to the eutrophication problem are multidimensional and include actions to restore wetlands and riparian buffer zones between farms and surface waters, reduce livestock densities, improve efficiencies of fertilizer applications, treat urban runoff from streets and storm drains, reduce N emissions from vehicles and power plants, and further increase the efficiency of N and P removal from municipal wastewater. As coastal fish and shellfish aquaculture expand, management considerations of this rapidly growing internal source of nutrients will be required as well.




Via : http://www.eoearth.org/article/Eutrophication
Comments :  Since the dawn of human civilization, we have depended on environmental resources. However, as our technology developed, we started to harm and destroy the environment. The necessity of recovering the harmed environment has been increasing, but no significant action has been taken place. The eutrophication has been a major issue, especially in big cities, resorts, or places with high population density. We have to be aware of this and try to resolve this problem !!

One of the solutions that i found is the following
1) The Tertiary Treatment:
Aluminum sulfate (alum) [Al2(SO4)3] when added to lake water removes phosphates through precipitation. It forms aluminum ions, which are hydrated (combined with water) as follows:
Al+3 + 6 H2O ⇄ Al (H2O)63+ 
In a series of chemical hydrolysis steps, hydrogen ions are liberated, which may lower the water pH, and ultimately forms aluminum hydroxide...




Water Pollution Disease 2

We are going to explore water pollution diseases in details- some of the diseases that are sectional.

First is Cyanosis

In January 1993, Mr. Yoon went to hospital because of his 10-month baby who showed the symptoms of discoloration of the body, breathing troubles, and low-oxygen. As a result of diagnosing the baby, it was found that the baby was the first cyanosis (caused by polluted drinking water) patient in Korea. The professor who examined this baby said that he wondered why no heart trouble was found in the baby through ultrasonography.
However, hearing that the baby’s mother reconstituted the powdered milk in underground water in her mother’s house and gave it to her baby, the professor examined the dynamics including a water quality test and found that the underground water contained 30~298ppm of nitrate.

The above is the first case of cyanosis found in Korea. Cyanosis appears when a person has a gifted heart trouble or any trouble with the lung, but cyanosis caused by water pollution was first in Korea at that time. Cyanosis is the disease that the nitrate contained in polluted water joins together with hemoglobin in the body so the supply of oxygen becomes difficult. The reason for giving the name of cyanosis is that the whole body is changed blue due to a lack of oxygen. In general, 1~2% of the hemoglobin in the body exists in the form of methaemoglobin, but in case this rate exceeds over 10%, cyanosis appears, and 30~40%-methaemoglobin causes anoxia. This disease is not found in adults and it is usually found in newly-born babies (younger than 100 days).

Unlike general milk, powdered milk is known to make the influence of nitrates in polluted water big. However, boiling water can’t be a solution. Even boiling water can increase the concentration of nitrates because water evaporates.
In addition, nitrates can come into the body through foods in addition to water. In developing countries that people drink unsanitary water, cyanosis appears frequently, the reason for which is that they drink polluted underground water like well water instead of water supply.


 Cyanosis of nail beds.


Next is Itai-Itai Disease (Japan)

The symptoms of Itai-Itai disease were first observed in 1913 and characterized between 1947 and 1955; it was 1968, however, before the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare officially declared that the disease was caused by chronic cadmium poisoning in conjunction with other factors such as the stresses of pregnancy and lactation, aging, and dietary deficiencies of vitamin D and calcium. The name arose from the cries of pain, "itai-itai" (ouch-ouch) by the most seriously stricken victims, older Japanese farm women. Although men, young women, and children were also exposed, 95% of the victims were post-menopausal women over 50 years of age. They usually had given birth to several children and had lived more than 30 years within 2 mi (3 km) of the lower stream of the Jinzu River near Toyama.
The disease started with symptoms similar to rheumatism, neuralgia, or neuritis. Then came bone lesions, osteomalacia, andosteoporosis, along with renal disfunction and proteinuria. As it escalated, pain in the pelvic region caused the victims to walk with a duck-like gait. Next, they were incapable of rising from their beds because even a slight strain caused bone fractures. The suffering could last many years before it finally ended with death. Overall, an estimated 199 victims have been identified, of which 162 had died by December 1992.
The number of victims increased during and after World War II as production expanded at the Kamioka Mine owned by the Mitsui Mining and Smelting Company. As 3,000 tons of zinc-lead ore per day were mined and smelted, cadmium was discharged in thewastewater. Downstream, farmers withdrew the fine particles offlotation tailings in the Jinzu River along with water for drinking and crop irrigation. As rice plants were damaged near the irrigation inlets, farmers dug small sedimentation pools that were ineffective against the nearly invisible poison.
Both the numbers of Itai-Itai disease patients and the damage to the rice crops rapidly decreased after the mining company built a large settling basin to purify the wastewater in 1955. However, even after the discharge into the Jinzu River was halted, the cadmium already in the rice paddy soils was augmented by airborne exhausts. Mining operations in several other Japanese prefectures also produced cadmium-contaminating rice, but afflicted individuals were not certified as Itai-Itai patients. That designation was applied only to those who lived in the Jinzu River area.
In 1972 the survivors and their families became the first pollutionvictims in Japan to win a lawsuit against a major company. They won because in 1939 Article 109 of the Mining Act had imposed strict liability upon mining facilities for damages caused by their activities. The plaintiffs had only to prove that cadmium discharged from the mine caused their disease, not that the company was negligent. As epidemiological proof of causation sufficed as legal proof in this case, it set a precedent for other pollution litigation as well.
Despite legal success and compensation, the problem of contaminated rice continues. In 1969 the government initially set a maximum allowable standard of 0.4 parts per million (ppm) cadmium in unpolished rice. However, because much of the contaminated farmland produced grain in excess of that level, in 1970 under the Foodstuffs Hygiene Law this was raised to 1 ppm cadmium for unpolished rice and 0.9 ppm cadmium for polished rice. To restore contaminated farmland, Japanese authorities instituted a program in which, each year, the most highly contaminated soils in a small area are exchanged for uncontaminated soils. Less contaminated soils are rehabilitated through the addition of lime, phosphate, and a cadmium sequestering agent, EDTA.
By 1990 about 10,720 acres (4,340 ha), or 66.7% of the approximately 16,080 acres (6,510 ha) of the most highly cadmium contaminated farmland had been restored. In the remaining contaminated areas where farm families continue to eat homegrown rice, the symptoms are alleviated by treatment with massive doses of vitamins B1, B12, D, calcium, and various hormones. New methods have also been devised to cause the cadmium to be excreted more rapidly. In addition, the high costs of compensation and restoration are leading to the conclusion that prevention is not only better but cheaper. This is perhaps the most encouraging factor of all.

Itai-Itai disease photos were sufficiently disturbing so I excluded them.



Last one is  Minamata Disease

In the mid 1950s the people of Minamata, Japan, on the coast of the Shiranui Sea, began to notice something wrong with the cats in their town. The cats appeared to be going insane, and were falling into the sea. The people thought the cats were committing suicide.
Soon the people in the town were also contracting a strange illness. Individuals began to have numbness in their limbs and lips. Some had difficulty hearing or seeing. Others developed shaking (tremors) in their arms and legs, difficulty walking, even brain damage. Others seemed to be going crazy, shouting uncontrollably.
Unknown syndrome called Minamata disease
In 1956, researchers worked to find the source of the illness, which they termed Minamata disease. Something was affecting the nervous systems of the people. One thing people in this fishing town had in common was that they all ate fish, so scientists suspected that the fish in Minamata Bay were being poisoned.
Chisso Corporation source of environmental pollution
A large petrochemical plant in Minamata run by Chisso Corporation was immediately suspect. Chisso denied the allegations and continued its manufacturing with no changes to the method of production. Finally, in July 1959 researchers from Kumamoto University found that organic mercury was the cause of Minamata disease.
Chisso continued to refute the information and any link of its mercury waste to the illness. It was later discovered that Chisso Corporation had dumped an estimated 27 tons of mercury compounds into Minamata Bay.
People severely affected
As the mercury dumping continued, babies were born to poisoned mothers. The children were born with severe deformities, including gnarled limbs, mental retardation, deafness, and blindness. A photographer, W. Eugene Smith, traveled to Minamata in the 1970s, and his series of photographs of the suffering of the people there were published and seen around the world.
The people fight back
The fishermen of Minamata began protesting against Chisso Corporation in 1959. They demanded compensation, and that Chisso quit dumping toxic waste. Chisso in turn tried to make deals with people affected by mercury poisoning using legal documents that stated it would compensate individuals for their illnesses, but would accept no present or future liability. Many people felt this was their only chance at receiving any compensation, and signed the papers.
A poisoning epidemic
Chisso finally quit poisoning the waters in Minamata in 1968. According to Japanese government figures, 2,955 people contracted Minamata disease, and 1,784 people have since died. Researchers believe, however, that the criteria the government uses to diagnose Minamata disease is too strict, and that anyone who showed any impairment in his/her senses should be certified as a victim. A group of these yet-to-be-recognized victims plans to file a compensation suit against the government.
Government also held liable
In October 1982, 40 plaintiffs filed suit against the Japanese government, saying it had failed to stop Chisso from polluting the environment, and had actually looked the other way while Chisso violated pollution laws. In April 2001 the Osaka High Court determined that the government's Health and Welfare Ministry should have begun taking regulatory action to stop the poisoning at the end of 1959, after it concluded that Minamata disease was caused by mercury poisoning. The court also ordered Chisso to pay $2.18 million in damages to the plaintiffs.
Supreme Court orders payment of damages
On October 16, 2004, the Supreme Court of Japan ordered the government to pay 71.5 million yen ($703,000) in damages to the Minamata disease victims. The Environment Minister bowed in apology to the plaintiffs. After 22 years, the plaintiffs achieved their goal of making those responsible for Japan's worst case of industrial pollution pay for their negligence. No amount of money, though, can ever make up for the lives needlessly lost to Minamata disease.
Information for this article was taken from:
- American University, The School of International Service. Minamata disaster.
- Kyodo News. Unrecognized Minamata disease patients to sue government. Japan Today, October 17, 2004.
- Mizoguchi, K. Court orders damages paid to Japan poisoning victims. The Boston Globe, October 16, 2004.
- Olson, D. A. (2002). Mercury. eMedicine, accessed at http://www.emedicine.com/neuro/topic617.htm
- Tanaka, F. Negligence clear in Minamata case. The Daily Yomiuri, October 17, 2004.





Comments : There is a misconception that water pollution only affects in the environment, but not as much as on humans. However, this is axiomatically wrong because there are many different diseases that you have to account for. Different chemicals that pollute the water brings out different physical and biological effect on our bodies. I always thought that boiling water would solve any kind of disease related to drinking water, however I found out that in some cases boiling water only increases the concentration of certain toxic chemical substances.